- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3812 WP No. 1943 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1943 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT SUHASINI T W/O JESHWANTH SUNIL KUMAR D D/O LATE THUDI RAJA RATHNAM AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 9/2, 2ND CROSS NEAR MILEENIUM ENGLISH SCHOOL C. RAMAIAH LAYOUT, VIDYARANYAPURA BANGALORE – 560097. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR C.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT SUJATHA ATRI W/O NISHANTH ATRI D/O LATE THUDI RAJA RATHNAM AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 9/2, 2ND CROSS NEAR MILEENIUM ENGLISH SCHOOL C. RAMAIAH LAYOUT, VIDYARANAYAPURA BANGALORE - 560097. 2. SRI VIJAYAKUMAR T S/O LATE THUDI RAJA RATHNAM AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.54, NTI LAYOUT SHIVARAMAIAH LAYOUT 3RD BLOCK, HRB LAYOUT BANGALORE - 560097. 3. SRI RAVI KUMAR T S/O LATE THUDI RAJA RATHNAM AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3812 WP No. 1943 of 2025 RESIDING AT NO.95, 3RD CROSS SHIVARAMAIAH LAYOUT 3RD BLOCK, HRB LAYOUT BANGALORE - 560097. 4. MRS. CANDIDA PREETHAM AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS DIRECTOR MANNA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS REGISTERED OFFICE NO. 102 EASTHER HARMONY NAGAVESWARA, NAGENAHALLI KOTHANNUR, BANGALORE - 560077. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE LEARNED I ADDL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT AT BANGALORE TO DISPOSE THE IA NO. 1 TO 3 FILED BY THE PETITIONER U/O 39 RULE 1 AND 2 OF THE CPC IN OS NO. 238/2024 PENDING ON THE FILE OF AS PER ANNEXURE-B1 TO 3 WITHOUT FURTHER DELAY AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER This writ petition is filed by the plaintiff under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a direction to the trial court to dispose of the applications filed by the plaintiff – IA Nos. 1 to 3. 2. In view of the above, service of notice to respondents is not necessary. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3812 WP No. 1943 of 2025 3. The plaintiff filed a suit for partition. Along with the plaint, she filed IA Nos. 1, 2 and 3 for temporary injunction. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff submits that the respondents, including the proposed respondents, are served with the notice. Inspite of that, the trial court has not passed any order on IA Nos. 1, 2 and 3. 5. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, if all the respondents, including the proposed respondents are served with notice, the trial court is directed to dispose of I.A.Nos. 1, 2 and 3, as expeditiously as possible, not later than two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE CM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 44