Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:16999-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3741 of 2024 Petitioner :- Shivam Kumar And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shantanu Sharma,Anshuman Sharma,Athar Ali,Sandeep Narayan Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Atul Kumar Singh Gaur connected with Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3654 of 2024 Petitioner :- Shri Prakash Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy., Deptt. Of Home, Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shantanu Sharma,Anshuman Sharma,Athar Ali Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Atul Kumar Singh Gaur and Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3672 of 2024 Petitioner :- Satya Narayan And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shantanu Sharma,Anshuman Sharma,Athar Ali,Sandeep Narayan Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Atul Kumar Singh Gaur Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary, J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. The petitioners seek issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing of the First Information Report dated 27.03.2024 bearing Case Crime No.0060 of 2024, under Sections 498-A, 377 and 504 IPC and Section ¾ Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Gomti Nagar Vistar, District Lucknow East. 3. On agreement of the parties, the matter was referred to the Mediation Centre of this Court on 30.05.2024, but as per the report of the Mediation Centre dated 05.02.2025, mediation has failed. 4. Submission of learned counsel for petitioners is that it is a matrimonial dispute and the allegations made in the FIR are general in nature and are incorrect and false. Specific details have not been given and the FIR has been lodged with exaggerated allegations. 5. Learned counsel for the complainant states that details have been provided with dates of different incidents in the FIR. There is nothing vague in the FIR and specific action of the accused has been given in the FIR. 6. Learned AGA states that Section 377 IPC has been dropped after recording the statement of the victim under Section 164 Cr.P.C. 7. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case and the evidence on record, we do not find any good ground for interference. 8. Writ petitions are accordingly dismissed. . (Brij Raj Singh, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 25.3.2025 Rao/- Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench