Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14024 (RAJ)

SANTOSH DEVI SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJ AND ORS

CW/7789/2010 · 2025-08-22

Anand Sharma

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:33382] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7789/2010 1. Santosh Devi Sharma W/o Shri Brajbihari Sharma, aged about 45 years, R/o Vivek Vihar, Karauli, Near Stadium Karauli. 2. Manoj Dutt Pandey S/o Shri Prakash Chand Pandey, aged about 30 years, R/o Badi Haveli, Mohalla Barpara, Bhusawar, Tehsil Weir, District Bharatpur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Secretary, Medical and Health Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. District Collector, Karauli. 3. Deputy Director, Women and Child Development Department, Karauli. 4. District Reproduction and Child Health Officer, Karauli. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13060/2013 1. Santosh Devi Sharma W/o Shri Brajbihari Sharma, aged about 47 years, R/o Vivek Vihar, R/o Karauli, Near Staidum Karauli. 2. Manoj Dutt Pandey S/o Shri Prakash Chand Pandey, aged about 32 years, R/o Badi Haveli, Mohalla Barpara, Bhusawar, Tehsil Weir, Distt. Bharatpur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Secretary, Medical and Health Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. District Collector, Karauli. 3. District Chief Medical and Health Officer, Karauli. 4. Additional Director (Admn.), Medical and Health Services Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pankaj Kumar for Mr. Manoj Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC with Mr. Anjali Sharma [2025:RJ-JP:33382] (2 of 2) [CW-7789/2010] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 22/08/2025 1. It has been submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that on account of efflux of time as well as due to completion of the project, for which the petitioners were appointed as Councelor, no cause of action for pursuing the instant writ petition survives and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. In view of above statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous. 3. Office is directed to place copy of this order on record of connected petition. (ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/21-22