Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010125362025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : W.P.(Crl.)/24/2025 NO. 101220325 CT/GD KEWAL SINGH 19TH BN, BSF (ATTACHED WITH 150 BN, BSF), S/O LATE JAGAT RAM, R/O VILL- GADI ZANOOL, P.O.- DODA, SUB DISTRICT- DODA, DIST- DODA, JAMMU AND KASHMIR, PIN-182202 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 7 ORS. THROUGH THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI, PIN-110001 2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL BORDER SECURITY FORCE BLOCK NO. 10 CGO COMPLEX LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI PIN-110003 3:THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF BORDER SECURITY FORCE (EASTERN COMMAND) 20/1 GURSADAY ROAD KOLKATA PIN-700019 4:INSPECTOR GENERAL BORDER SECURITY FORCE FRONTIER HQ GUWAHATI PIN-781017 5:DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL BORDER SECURITY FORCE Page No.# 2/3 SHQ DHUBRI ASSAM PIN-783339 6:COMMANDNAT 19 BN BORDER SECURITY FORCE RAMPURA FAZILKA PUNJAB PIN-152118 7:COMMANDANT 19 BN BORDER SECURITY FORCE ALAMGANJ DHUBRI ASSAM PIN-783339 8:COMMANDANT 150 BN BORDER SECURITY FORCE SHQ DHUBRI ASSAM PIN-78333 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR W R MEDHI, MR P TALUKDAR Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., MR. R K D CHOUDHURY (DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 22.07.2025 1. Heard Mr. W. R. Medhi, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R. K. D. Choudhury, learned Deputy SGI. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the Page No.# 3/3 petitioner had approached this Court against the order dated 31.01.2025 delivered in the open court by the General Security Force Court and whereby the petitioner was convicted under Section 12 of POCSO Act and sentenced with simple imprisonment for 5 years along with dismissal from service was awarded to him. However, the petitioner was not communicated with the confirmation of the said award and that time he was kept in the lock up of BSF Headquarter 150 Bn., Alamgarh, Dhubri. However, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that now the petitioner has been sent to District Jail, Dhubri and the relief which he was seeking in this writ petition has already been fulfilled and therefore he has submitted that this writ petition has become infructuous. 3. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed on becoming infructuous JUDGE Comparing Assistant