Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14022 (PAT)

Md. Isha v. The State of Bihar

CWJC/1842/2025 · 2025-02-11

Nawneet Kumar Pandey

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1842 of 2025 ====================================================== Md. Isha Son of Md. Phool Hasan, Resident of Ward No. 11, Shasan, Via- Basantpur Sugar Mills, P.S.- Hasanpur, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Panchayati Raj, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Collector, Samastipur. 4. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Samastipur. 5. The Circle Officer, Hasanpur, District- Samastipur. 6. The Programme Officer, Hasanpur, District- Samastipur. 7. The Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj Shasan, Hasanpur, District- Samastipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Masoom Alam For the Respondent/s : Mr.Y.P. Sinha, AAG-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 11-02-2025 Heard the parties. 2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for the following relief:- This writ application has been filed for issuance of a writ to restrain the respondents to construct Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan over Rayati land of the petitioner’s bearing is Khata No. 75 Khesra No. 186, area 5 katha land, Thana No. 296, situated in village and P.O. Shasan, P.S.- Hasanpur, District Samastipur. 3. The land where the Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan is proposed to be constructed, has been entered in the revenue Patna High Court CWJC No.1842 of 2025(2) dt.11-02-2025 2/2 records as Anabad Bihar Sarkar. The petitioner claims the land to be his raiyati land and admittedly, a title suit is going on. 4. The petitioner may seek relief before the appropriate authority in accordance with law. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed. Nirmal/- (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) U