MOHD. RAISH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. PRIN. SECY. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
CRLP/4225/2025 · 2025-05-22
Brij Raj Singh, Vivek Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 140211 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 140211 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:30498-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4225 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mohd. Raish Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Prin. Secy. Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijesh Singh Vishen,Amrita Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State-opposite parties.
2. By means of this petition, the petitioner, who is the informant, is seeking a writ of Mandamus directing the opposite parties to make proper, fair and speedy investigation in Case Crime No.583 of 2020, under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B I.P.C., Police Station Gomti Nagar, District Lucknow in a time bound manner.
3. The petitioner wants fair and prompt investigation.
4. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the allegations as the investigation is still pending, let the petitioner approach the Commissioner of Police (East), Lucknow raising his grievance, who shall get the matter inquired and ensure fair and prompt investigation. However, if the petitioner is still aggrieved that is in spite of the aforesaid, he may approach the Jurisdictional Magistrate concerned in this regard in view of the
judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others; (2008) 2 SCC
409.
5. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the petition is
disposed of. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Vivek Chaudhary,J.)
Order Date :- 22.5.2025 Anupam S/- Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench