Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 140210 (ALL)

RADHEY SHAYAM YADAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/4087/2025 · 2025-05-16

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:29042 Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4087 of 2025 Applicant :- Radhey Shayam Yadav And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Dayal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., has been filed by the applicants for quashing the summoning order dated 11.02.2025 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), F.T.C./ Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow in Complaint Case No. 48618 of 2024 (Geeta Yadav vs. Anil Yadav and others) under Sections 323 and 504 of the IPC, as well as the bailable warrant order dated 05.05.2025 issued against the applicants. 3. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press this application and seeks liberty to move an application for discharge through counsel before the trial court and the same may be decided by the learned trial court in a time bound manner. 4. Accordingly, it is provided that in case, the applicants move an appropriate application for discharge through counsel before the concerned Court below within a period of fifteen days from today, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months in accordance with law, by the concerned trial court. 5. With the aforesaid directions, this petition is finally disposed of. . (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 16.5.2025 Muk Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench