MOHA ALOM AHMED AND 6 ORS. v. SEWALI DEVI SHARMA AND 2 ORS.
Cont.Cas(C)/393/2020 · 2025-02-16
Robin Phukan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14015 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14015 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010125512020
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/393/2020 MOHA ALOM AHMED AND 6 ORS.
C/O. LT. MOZZAMMEL HOQUE BEPARI, VILL. KADAMTOLI, P.O.
JHOWDANGA, P.S. MANKACHAR, DIST. SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR, ASSAM.
2: SAHIDUR ROHMAN C/O. SOPIOR ROHMAN VILL. KODAL DHOWA P.O. KALAPANI P.S. MANKACHAR DIST. SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR ASSAM.
3: ASHADUL ABEDIN C/O. JOYNAL ABEDIN VILL. KATHALBARI P.O. PURANDIARA P.S. MANKACHAR DIST. SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR ASSAM.
4: SHAMI NUZ ZAMAN C/O. SAYEDUZ ZAMAN VILL. COLLEGE NAGAR P.O. AND P.S. MANKACHAR DIST. SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR ASSAM.
5: AKAN CH. NATH C/O. LT. DINESH CH. NATH VILL. DEWANGAON P.O. NORTH BOITAMARI P.S. BONGAIGAON DIST. BONGAIGAON
Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM.
6: DEBOJYOTI NATH C/O. JAGADISH CH. NATH VILL. BASHBARI P.O. NORTH BOITAMARI P.S. BONGAIGAON DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM.
7: MOHIBUL HUSSAIN S/O. LT. AGAR ALI VILL. DHAMTOLA P.O. DHAMTOLA BAZAR P.S. ABHAYAPURI DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM VERSUS SEWALI DEVI SHARMA AND 2 ORS.
SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006.
2:BIJOYA CHOUDHURY DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPTT. ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-781019.
3:B. KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHY THE MISSION DIRECTOR SARBA SIKSHA ABHIJAN KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-781019 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. U K NAIR, MR. N K KALITA,MR D DEKA Advocate for the Respondent : , MR S M T CHISTIE (r-2),MR. D SAIKIA (r-2),MR. M R LASKAR,MS. N PHUKAN,MR. B GOGOI,MR P NAYAK,MR A CHALIHA
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN ORDER
Page No.# 3/3 17.02.2025
Heard Ms. P. Boro, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. N.K. Kalita, learned counsl for the petitioner; Mr. S.M.T. Chisti, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2; and Mr. D. Gogoi, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3. Ms. Boro submits that this matter becomes infructuous as the order has been complied with. In view of above, this contempt case stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant