Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14013 (CHH)

GAUTAM JANGHEL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH,

WPC/2081/2021 · 2025-07-17

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2081 of 2021 1 - Gautam Janghel S/o Gulapi Ram Janghel, Aged About 34 Years R/o. Village And Post Bundeli, Police Station And Tahsil Chhuikhadan, District - Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Its Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Collector - Rajnandgaon, District - Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Chief Executive Officer, District Panchayat Rajnandgaon, District - Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Chhuikhdan, District - Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Love Kumar Ramteke, Advocate For State : Mr. Shubham Bajpai, P.L. For Respondent No. 4 : Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Vikram Sharma, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order On Board 18-07-2025 1) At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2025.07.21 10:21:01 +0530 2 permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to prefer appeal before the appellate authority and the authority concerned may be directed to consider the application for condonation of delay taking lenient view. 2) No objection from other side. 3) Consequently, this petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. In case, petitioner prefers appeal before the appellate authority, it is expected that the authority concerned shall take lenient view while deciding the application for condonation of delay as the matter remained pending before this Court for considerable period. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE Ajinkya