ARMAN JAHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/4570/2025 · 2025-05-16
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 140124 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 140124 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:28975-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4570 of 2025 Petitioner :- Arman Jahan Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arif Hussain,Gitesh Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
1. Heard.
2. There appears to be some dispute between the petitioner and respondent nos.4 and 5, regarding placing of Tazia. Such disputes are not amenable to adjudication under writ jurisdiction.
3. We categorically asked learned counsel for petitioner as to under which provision the respondent nos.2 and 3 would have jurisdiction to decide such a dispute, but no such provision could be placed by the counsel.
4. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail any other remedy, as may be prescribed to him, under law. (Om Prakash Shukla, J.)(Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 16.5.2025 Arnima Digitally signed by :- ARNIMA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ARNIMA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench