2025:HHC:30050 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA LPA No.222 of 2025 Decided on: 03.09.2025 __________________________________________________________ Smt. Punu Devi ...Appellant..... Versus State of H.P. and others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting?. For the petitioner: Mr. Sahil Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Ms. Priyanka Chauhdn, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No. 1 to 6-State. None for respondent No.7. Mr. Shagun Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.8. None for respondent No.9. G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice[Oral] Counsel for the appellant submits that he does not wish to press the present appeal, keeping in view the fact that necessary exercise has been conducted by the Additional District Magistrate Kullu, H.P. who had allowed her appeal on 16.07.2025 and held that she is more meritorious and directions had been given to appoint her with immediate effect. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2025:HHC:30050 - 2 - 2. Even on the last date of hearing, counsel for respondent No.9-Amra Devi, had submitted that he had already challenged the said order before the Appellate Authority. 3. Resultantly, the present appeal has been rendered infructuous. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (G.S. Sandhawalia) Chief Justice (Ranjan Sharma) Judge 3rd September, 2025 [himani/Bhardwaj]