GAYATRI JAISWAL v. NAYAB TEHSILDAR (SARVE) TEHSIL SADAR DISTRICT AYODHYA AND ANOTHER
A227/2881/2025 · 2025-05-15
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 140079 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 140079 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:28549 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2881 of 2025 Petitioner :- Gayatri Jaiswal Respondent :- Nayab Tehsildar (Sarve) Tehsil Sadar District Ayodhya And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudhakar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent is hereby dispensed with. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief:-
"(i) Direct the opposite party No. 1 to decide Computerized the Case No. T202404230110279, U/S-49(5) U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Gayatri Jaiswal VS Ajay Rastogi) pending since 23-08-2024 within stipulated time as fixed by this Hon'ble court, in the interest of justice." Taking note of the fact and that proceedings under Section 49 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 being summary in nature, should preferably be decided within a period of three months, however, in the instant case, the case has not been decided till date, which is pending since 23.08.2024 and on account of pendency of the aforesaid case, petitioner, as stated, is suffering great hardship and mental agony, this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose will be served in keeping this petition pending. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1/Nayab Tehsildar (Sarve), Tehsil - Sadar, District Ayodhya to consider and decide the Case No.T202404230110279 (Gayatri Jaiswal VS Ajay Rastogi), most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party preferably within a period of three months from the next date fixed in the case, if possible and if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 15.5.2025 ML/- Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench