Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010179532021
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2563/2024 THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE GM NFR MALIGAON GUWAHATI KAMRUP(M) ASSAM-781011 VERSUS SUSMITA DAS AND ORS W/O- LATE DIGANTA DAS R/O- BHABANIPUR KAILASH NAGAR NOONMATI KAMRUP METRO ASSAM-781020 2:HIRAMONI DAS D/O- LATE DIGANTA DAS R/O- BHABANIPUR KAILASH NAGAR NOONMATI KAMRUP METRO ASSAM-781020 3:MANASH DAS (SINCE THE PETITIONER NO 2 AND 3 ARE MINORS THEREFORE THEY ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER WHO IS A PETITIONER NO 1)
Page No.# 2/4 S/O- LATE DIGANTA DAS R/O- BHABANIPUR KAILASH NAGAR NOONMATI KAMRUP METRO ASSAM-781020 4:SHRI SABIN DAS S/O- LATE UPEN DAS ( FATHER OF LATE DIGNATA DAS) R/O- BHABANIPUR KAILASH NAGAR NOONMATI KAMRUP METRO ASSAM-781020 5:SARASWATI DAS W/O- SABIN DAS (MOTHER OF LATE DIGANTA DAS) R/O- BHABANIPUR KAILASH NAGAR NOONMATI KAMRUP METRO ASSAM-781020 6:THE ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD. REPRESENTED BY ITS MD BIJULEE BHAWAN PALTAN BAZAR GHY-781001 7:THE SUB DIVISIONAL ENGINEER CHANDMARI ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION APDCL LAR GUWAHATI-3 8:THE OC CHANDMARI POLICE STATION GUWAHATI DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM-781003 9:RAJIB SING S/O PREM BAHADUR SINGH 68 CHAK SATAI MISIR ARAIL KARCHHANA P.S- NAINI
Page No.# 3/4 DIST- ALLAHABAD UTTAR PRADESH PIN- 211008. 10:UTPAL BARMAN C/O- NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAYS MALIGAON GUWAHATI KAMRUP (M) ASSAM-781011 11:THE CHIEF ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR INSPECTORATE OF ELECTRICITY POWER (ELECTRICITY DEPARTMENT) WEST END BLOCK 1ST FLOOR HOUSEFED COMPLEX DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006. ------------ Advocate for : GAUTAM GOSWAMI Advocate for : MR H BEZBARUA appearing for SUSMITA DAS AND ORS
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER 04.04.2025
Heard Mr. G. Goswami, learned Standing Counsel for the Railway/applicant. Also heard Mr. R. Mazumdar, learned counsel for the opposite party/petitioner. The present application is filed for deleting the name of the respondent No. 1 as party respondent in the connected writ petition. It is the contention that the writ petitioner ought not to have impleaded respondent No. 1 instead of Central Organization for Railway Electrification, Guwahati Gr. 257 (CORE/GHY Gr.257) which has now been transferred to N. F. Railway, Construction, Maligaon, Guwahati-11 is the necessary party. Page No.# 4/4 It is also contended that the aforesaid entity i.e. N. F. Railway (Construction) Maligaon, Guwahati is a separate Construction Organization. This Court is also of the opinion that the said entity shall be a necessary party.
Therefore, this Court though rejects the prayer for deleting the name of the respondent No. 1 from the array parties, however, the learned counsel for the opposite party/petitioner is permitted to implead the N. F. Railway (Construction) represented by the General Manager (Construction), N. F. Railway, Maligaon, Guwahati-11 as party respondent No. 8 in the connected writ petition. Accordingly, Mr. Mazumdar, learned counsel for the opposite party/petitioner shall amend the cause title, submit the same before the Registry for doing the needful and serve a copy of the amended cause title to the contesting parties. I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant