Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14003 (RAJ)

SHOYAB S/O ISRAEL KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4529/2025 · 2025-06-11

Anand Sharma V J

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:23055] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4529/2025 Shoyab S/o Israel Khan, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Machdi, Police Station Akbarpur District Alwar, Rajasthan. (Currently The Accused Is Confined In Central Jail, Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4530/2025 Wasim Akram S/o Fakruddin, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Salpur, Police Station Aravali Vihar, Alwar (Rajasthan). (Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Alwar) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4638/2025 Raghvendra Alias Lucky Palawat S/o Aamendra Singh, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Gujuki, Police Station Arawali Vihar, Alwar. (Presently Confined In District Jail, Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4639/2025 Varis Son of Raheesh Khan, Aged About 21 Years, Resident of Machdi, Police Station Akbarpur, District Alwar (Rajasthan) ( At Present Confined In District Jail Alwar) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through P.P ----Respondent [2025:RJ-JP:23055] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4529/2025] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Junaid Mansoori Mr. Prakash Thakuriya Mr. Sandeep Kumar Maheshwari Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, Addl. G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA (V. J.) Order 11/06/2025 1. These bail applications under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the accused- petitioners in respect of F.I.R. No.98/2025 registered at Police Station N.E.B. District Alwar for the offences punishable under Sections 318(2), 319(2) & 61(2) of B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66(D) of I.T. Act, 2008. 2. Learned counsels for the accused-petitioners submit that they have falsely been implicated in the case, whereas they have not committed the offences alleged against them in the FIR. Charge-sheet has also been filed. Offences alleged against them are triable by Magistrate. Trial is likely to take considerably long time. Hence, they have prayed for grant the bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed these bail applications. 4. Considered the submissions made at Bar. 5. In view of above, without making any comment over the merits of the case, I am inclined to grant these bail applications. 6. Accordingly, these Bail Applications are hereby allowed. The accused-petitioners Shoyab S/o Israel Khan, Wasim Akram S/o Fakruddin, Raghvendra Alias Lucky Palawat S/o Aamendra Singh & Varis Son of Raheesh Khan shall be [2025:RJ-JP:23055] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4529/2025] released on bail in pursuance of F.I.R. No.98/2025 registered at Police Station N.E.B. District Alwar on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- each along with two sureties of the like amount. That apart, the accused-petitioners shall also follow the conditions as under:- (i) They shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case. (ii) They shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. (iii) They shall co-operate in the trial and shall attend each and every date of hearing in the trial, until and unless their presence is exempted by the trial Court. 7. In case of failure of observance of the conditions, a ground for cancellation of bail would arise. (ANAND SHARMA (V. J.)),J DAKSH/84-87