Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14003 (JHR)

Chandan Mittal v. Smt Kabita Prasad And Ors

MA/597/2017 · 2025-04-09

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:10893 -1- M.A. No. 597 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI M.A. No. 597 of 2017 Chandan Mittal, son of Shambhu Prasad Mittal, resident of House No.13, Riverview, Bank Colony, Beside Bhatia Park, Kadma, P.O. & P.S. Kadma, Town- Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum … Appellant -Versus- 1. Smt. Kabita Prasad, wife of Sri B.K. Prasad, resident of H. No.1, River View Colony, Near Bhatia Park, P.O. & P.S. Kadma, Town- Jamshedpur, District- Singhbhum East 2. Smt. Munmun Bakshi, wife of Late A. Bakshi, resident of H. No.5, River View Colony, Near Bhatia Park, P.O. & P.S. Kadma, Town- Jamshedpur, District- Singhbhum East 3. Smt. Annapurna Senroy, wife of Late Dr. R.R. Senroy, resident of H. No.6, River View Colony, Near Bhatia Park, P.O. & P.S. Kadma, Town- Jamshedpur, District- Singhbhum East 4. Smt. Rebena Dutta, wife of Sri P.K. Dutta, resident of H. No.7, River View Colony, Near Bhatia Park, P.O. & P.S. Kadma, Town- Jamshedpur, District- Singhbhum East 5. Suprio Majumdar, son of Late S.K. Majumdar, resident of H. No.8, River View Colony, Near Bhatia Park, P.O. & P.S. Kadma, Town- Jamshedpur, District- Singhbhum East 6. Debashish Dey, son of Late K.M. Dey, resident of H. No.9, River View Colony, Near Bhatia Park, P.O. & P.S. Kadma, Town- Jamshedpur, District- Singhbhum East 7. Ranjan Banerjee, son of Late H.P. Banerjee, resident of H. No.10, River View Colony, Near Bhatia Park, P.O. & P.S. Kadma, Town- Jamshedpur, District- Singhbhum East 8. Smt. Geetanjali Basak, wife of Late A.K. Basak, resident of H. No.11, River View Colony, Near Bhatia Park, P.O. & P.S. Kadma, Town- Jamshedpur, District- Singhbhum East 9. Tapan Kumar Bagti, son of Late M.L. Bagti, resident of H. No.15, River View Colony, Near Bhatia Park, P.O. & P.S. Kadma, Town- Jamshedpur, District- Singhbhum East 10. Sasthi Charan Ghosh, son of Late N.K. Ghosh, resident of H. No.16, River View Colony, Near Bhatia Park, P.O. & P.S. Kadma, Town- Jamshedpur, District- Singhbhum East 11. Pramod Kumar Das, son of Late G.B. Das, resident of H. No.17(B), River View Colony, Near Bhatia Park, P.O. & P.S. Kadma, Town- Jamshedpur, District- Singhbhum East 12. Smt. Namita Bhaduri, son of Late S.K. Bhaduri, resident of H. No.17(C), River View Colony, Near Bhatia Park, P.O. & P.S. Kadma, Town- Jamshedpur, District- Singhbhum East 13. Amal Kumar Banerjee, son of Late K.L. Banerjee, resident of H. No.18, River View Colony, Near Bhatia Park, P.O. & P.S. Kadma, Town- Jamshedpur, District- Singhbhum East 14. Amit Kumar Maity, son of Late A.K. Maity, resident of H. No.19, River View Colony, Near Bhatia Park, P.O. & P.S. Kadma, Town- Jamshedpur, District- Singhbhum East 2025:JHHC:10893 -2- M.A. No. 597 of 2017 15. Tapas Kumar Das, son of Late G.B. Das, resident of H. No.20, River View Colony, Near Bhatia Park, P.O. & P.S. Kadma, Town- Jamshedpur, District- Singhbhum East 16. Makhan Das 17. Upender Nath Das 18. Biswanath Das All sons of Late Manohar Das Sl. Nos.16 to 18, resident of H. No.66, Main Road, Bhatiya Basti, Kadma, P.O. & P.S. Kadma, Town- Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum 19. Rajo Bala Devi, wife of Late Nimai Chandra Das, resident of Bhatia Basti, P.O. & P.S. Kadma, Town- Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum … Respondents ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Appellant : None For Respondent Nos.1 to 3, 5 to 10 & 12 to 15 : Mr. Tarun Kumar Mahato, Advocate ----- 07/09.04.2025 Mr. Ajay Kumar Sah, learned counsel submits that the appellant has taken NOC from the office of Mr. Indrajit Sinha in the year 2018 itself. 2. Mr. Tarun Kumar Mahato, learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 1 to 3, 5 to 10 and 12 to 15 is present. 3. NOC, as submitted by Mr. Sah was taken in the year 2018 and till date, no alternative arrangement has been made by the appellant either to appear in person or to appoint any other counsel, which clearly suggests that the appellant has lost interest in the matter and, as such, this appeal is dismissed. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Ajay/