THE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATOR AND PROJECT DIRECTOR PIU MANDI v. VIJAY KUMARI AND ORS
OMPM/172/2025 · 2025-09-05
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14003 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14003 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Highway Administrator and Project Director Vs. Vijay Kumari & Ors.
OMP(M) No.172 of 2025 05.09.2025 Present: Mr. Sumeet Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. Gunjan Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Rajat Choudhry, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No.2 and 3.
OMP(M) No.172 of 2025
Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1 and learned Assistant Advocate General have no objection for condoning the delay in instituting the main appeal.
I have considered the application, which makes out cogent reasons for condoning the delay. In view of aforesaid, the application is allowed. Delay in filing the appeal is condoned.
The application stands disposed of.
OMP No.1234 of 2025
Infructuous.
Arb. Appeal No.412 of 2025
Be registered.
List for consideration on 23.09.2025.
Name of learned Advocate General be reflected in the cause list for respondents No.2 and 3 henceforth.
OMP No.1233 of 2025
Heard. Subject to deposit of entire awarded amount alongwith up to date interest in the Registry of this
Court within a period of three weeks from today, operation and execution of the impugned
judgment dated 05.11.2024, passed by the learned District Judge Mandi, H.P. in Arbitration Case No.309 of 2024 (The Highway Administrator and Project Director Versus Sh. Vijay Kumari and others), shall remain stayed.
The application stands disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua September 05, 2025
Judge
Mukesh