PADUCHURI VENKATA RANGA RAO v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/22111/2025 · 2026-04-14
D Ramesh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1400 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1400 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010426532025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 22111/2025 Between:
1. PADUCHURI VENKATA RANGA RAO, S/O. NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCC. SENIOR ASSISTANT, R/O. D.N0.3-6-15A, OLD BADWEL ROAD, GIDDALUR TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, A.P.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY, ENVIRONMENT, FOREST, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS HOFF, FOREST DEPARTMENT, ARANYA BHAVAN, P.V.S. LAND MARK, NEAR APIIC
TOWERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, GUNTUR CIRCLE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S):
2
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SRINIVASA RAO NARRA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.22111 of 2025 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed seeking the following relief:
“….to issue any writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent authorities more particularly the Respondent No.2 in issuing the impugned Proceedings vide Rc.No.EFS02- 11031/16/2024-ADMIN SEC PCCF/Admn-3 dated 30.07.2025 by denying the Petitioner's request to cancel his earlier absorption order Ref. No.EFS02- 11031/16/2024-ADMIN SEC PCCF/Admn-3 dated 22.07.2024 and not reverting the Petitioner back to his original working place Guntur Circle Unit as highly illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice and in violation of Article 14, 16, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the impugned Proceedings vide Rc.No.EFS02-11031/16/2024-ADMIN SEC PCCF/Admn-3 dated 30.07.2025 issued by the Respondent No.2 and direct the Respondents to consider the Petitioner's request by reverting him back to his original working place Guntur Circle Unit in the post of Senior Assistant as there is a clear vacancy readily available….”
4
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and on perusal of the record, without going into the merits of the case, the respondents are directed to consider the request made by the petitioner on 25.02.2025, if rule permits and to pass appropriate orders based on the record.
The said exercise shall be completed within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
Date: 15.04.2026 Ivd
5
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
WRIT PETITION No.22111 of 2025
Dated: 15.04.2026
Ivd