Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13997 (PNJ)

GAGANDEEP SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR

CRM-M/3765/2025 · 2025-04-24

Kirti Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-3765-2025 262 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-3765-2025 Date of Decision : 24.04.2025 Gagandeep Singh .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present: Mr. Ajiteshwar Singh, Advocate for the petitioner (through Video Conferencing) Ms. Aakanksha Gupta, AAG Punjab Mr. Parunjeet Singh, Advocate for respondent No. 2 KIRTI SINGH, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 for quashing of case No.CHI/428/2022 titled as State of Punjab Vs. Gagandeep Singh bearing CNR No.PBJL030182332022, lodged before the JMIC, Jalandhar and quashing of FIR No.133 dated 25.11.2021 lodged at Police Station Women, Police Commissionerate, Jalandhar under Section 498-A IPC along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 23.12.2024 (Annexure P5) arrived at between the parties. 2. This Court while issuing notice of motion vide order dated 23.01.2025, directed the parties to appear before the trial Court/Illaqa/Duty Magistrate for recording their statements with regard to the compromise. 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, report dated 11.02.2025 has been received from the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jalandhary. A perusal of the said REENA 2025.04.28 03:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-3765-2025 report reveals that neither the accused/petitioners nor the complainant appeared before the Court till 10.02.2025 despite issuance of notice for recording their statements with regard to compromise. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file fresh one, if any compromise regarding case No.CHI/428/2022 and FIR in question is effected between the parties. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforementioned liberty. (KIRTI SINGH) 24.04.2025 JUDGE reena Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No REENA 2025.04.28 03:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh