Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 139969 (ALL)

RAM NEWAL YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF AGRICULTURE LKO. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIA/5283/2025 · 2025-05-16

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:28980 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5283 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Newal Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Agriculture Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Yadav,Afzal Ahmad,Amit Yadav,Saurabh Yadav,Sayyed Farooq Ahmad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prashant Kumar Singh Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Shri Vinod Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Pankaj Patel, learned Standing Counsel for the opposite party No. 1 and Sri Prashank Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party Nos. 2 to 7. 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- "(I) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of Mandamus commanding the respondents to pay the petitioner the remaining/unpaid portion of the minimum wages for the period from 23.07.2002 to 21.09.2021 as arrears. (II) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 17.08.2024 and 16.07.2024 annexed as Annexure No. 1 to instant writ petition expeditiously, within a time bound frame, in accordance with law." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of his grievance the petitioner has preferred a representation dated 17.08.2024 to the opposite party No.4, but no decision has been taken on the same till date. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, he may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.2, i.e., Vice Chancellor, Acharya Narendra Dev University of Agriculture and Technology Kumarganj, Ayodhya and direction may be issued him to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner with expedition. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection if direction for disposal of the said representation is issued. 6. Therefore, in view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose of this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.2, i.e., Vice Chancellor, Acharya Narendra Dev University of Agriculture and Technology Kumarganj, Ayodhya ventilating his grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him enclosing therewith the copy of his earlier representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of fifteen days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly in accordance with law, by speaking and reasoned order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. 7. This writ petition is disposed of finally, in view of the aforesaid terms. . [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 16.5.2025 Suresh/ Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench