Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 139963 (PNJ)

NARESH KUMAR v. MANPREET

COCP/2166/2025 · 2025-10-30

Pankaj Jain

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[214] Naresh Ku Manpreet Coram : Present: PANKAJ J [1] contact wit the current [2] in the prese [3] [4] the petition [5] disposed of 30.10.2025 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF PU AT CHANDIGAR COCP-216 Date of De sh Kumar versus preet HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PA Mr. Ankit Aggarwal, Advocate Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocate **** KAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the peti ct with the petitioner and, therefore, urrent state of affairs. In view of the above, no furthe e present contempt petition. Disposed off. However, liberty is granted to etition, if so advised. All pending miscellaneous a ed off. .2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 2166-2025 (O&M) of Decision : 30.10.2025 …Petitioner ….Respondent PANKAJ JAIN vocate for the petitioner. ocate for the respondent. e petitioner submits that he is not efore, is unable to apprise the Court o further orders are required to be passe ted to the petitioner to seek revival of eous application(s), if any, stands (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No not in ourt of e passed val of tands RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.10.30 17:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document