HARSHIT MISHRA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LKO AND OTHERS
CRLP/4140/2025 · 2025-05-15
Ajai Kumar Srivastava I, Attau Rahman Masoodi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 139955 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 139955 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:28736-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4140 of 2025 Petitioner :- Harshit Mishra And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dilip Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the opposite party no. 4 is dispensed with.
3. This petition seeks issuance of a direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 3.5.2025 registered as Case Crime/F.I.R. No. 0195 of 2025 under Sections 191(2), 3(5), 115(2), 117(2), 352, 351(2) and 333 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3(1)(da), 3(1) (gha), 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, police station Kotwali City, district Pratapgarh.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the offences as alleged in the F.I.R. have maximum punishment for the term less than seven years imprisonment whereas the police
is trying to arrest them, which is against the mandate of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
5. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondent State has given a statement on behalf of the Investigating Agency that because the offence allegedly committed by the petitioners entails sentence of less than seven years, provisions of Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 shall be strictly followed in terms of judgement rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in a case reported in (2014)8 SCC 273: Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another.
6. Considering the stand of the investigating agency, learned counsel for the petitioners states that let this petition be
disposed of in view of the above said facts.
7. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the law as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar(supra). . [Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J.] [Attau Rahman Masoodi, J.]
Order Date :- 15.5.2025 kanhaiya Digitally signed by :- KANHAIYA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench