APHC010171032020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 10791/2020 Between: Arli Satyavathamma and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P RAJKUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 2 ORDER:- 1. It is the case of the petitioner that once Sri Arle Kalyanam, who is the husband of 1st petitioner was assigned land admeasuring an extent of Ac.0-52 cents in Sy.No.119/8, an extent of Ac.0-34 cents in Sy.No.124/1, an extent of Ac.1-06 cents in Sy.No.124/5 and an extent of Ac.0-40 cents in Sy.No.127/1 situated in MK Vallapuram Village, V Madugula Mandal, Visakhpatnam District by virtue of proceedings in DC No.47/1403/A, dated 30.09.1993. The said Kalyanam was in possession and enjoyment of said lands during his life time. 2. It is further case of the petitioner that subsequent to his demise, in the family partition, land admeasuring an extent of Ac.0-43 cents, an extent of Ac.0-13 cents, an extent of Ac.0-13 cents and an extent of Ac.0-13 fell to the share the petitioners respectively. In further thereto, the petitioners approached the 4th respondent seeking to mutate their names in revenue records. It is further contended that after enquiry, the 4th respondent mutated the names of the petitioners in revenue records as per the partition deed and issued pattadar pass books in their favour. 3. It is further case of the petitioner that the 4th respondent along with his staff visited the subject land and 3 started taking measurements, when enquired, it was informed to the petitioners that the subject land is identified for the purpose of distribution of house site pattas to the eligible beneficiaries under Navarathnalu Pedalandariki Illu Scheme. It is further case of the petitioners that the 4th respondent orally directed the petitioners to vacate themselves from the subject lands, the petitioners approached this Court by filing the present writ petition. 4. By order dated 02.07.2020, this Court directed the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners from the subject lands without following due process of law. 5. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the Government Pleader for Revenue submitted that in view of interim order, the respondents did not interfere with the possession of the petitioners. It is further submitted that if the subject lands are required for public purpose, the same will be resumed after following the due procedure as per law. 6. Taking into consideration of the submission made by the Government Pleader for Revenue, the present writ petition is disposed of directed the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners from the subject lands except in accordance with law. 4 There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR 20.03.2025 DR 5 467 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR W.P.No.10791 of 2020 Date: 20.03.2025 U DR