IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP(S) No.2494 of 2018 ----- Rinki Kumari, aged 24 years, wife of Sunil Kumar and daughter of Sri Binod Prajapati, presently residing at village Karani, Pandeypura Panchayat, PO Karma and PS Hunterganj, District Chatra, Jharkhand … Petitioner(s). Versus 1.State of Jharkhand 2.Director General cum Inspector General of Police, Jharkhand, Ranchi, Police Head Quarter, PO and PS Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand 3.Deputy Inspector General of Police, Jharkhand Armed Police (JAP), Ranchi, PO and PS Doranda, District Ranchi, Jharkhand 4.Senior Superintendent of Police, Dhanbad, PO and PS Dhanbad, District Dhanbad, Jharkhand 5.Commandant, Jharkhand Armed Police, JAP-6, Jamshedpur, PO and PS Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum, Jharkhand 6.Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission through its Secretary, having its office at Kalinagar, Chaibagan, Namkum, PO and PS Namkum, District Ranchi, Jharkhand … Respondents. CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, AC to SC(L&C) II For the JSSC : Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, Advocate Mr. Prince Kumar, Advocate Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Advocate Mr. Jay Prakash, Advocate …...... 08 /13.02.2025: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner has challenged the order no. 3771 of 2017 passed by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Dhanbad contained in Memo No. 4568 whereby the petitioner-Rinki Kumari and two others namely, Nainanad Kumar and Gautam Kumar were dismissed. The ground for dismissing the petitioner is that the petitioner is not a matriculate from the State of Jharkhand. 3. The same memo which is under challenge in this writ application was subject matter of WP(S) No. 7458 of 2017 which was filed at the instance of Nainanad Kumar and Gautam Kumar. The coordinate Bench of this Court in WP(S) No. 7458 of 2017 vide order dated 18.01.2018 allowed the writ petition by setting aside the termination order holding that the respondent- Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission has withdrawn its recommendation dated 30.11.2017. It has been submitted that after the writ application was allowed, Nainanad Kumar and Gautam Kumar have been reinstated in service. 4. After going through the impugned order, I find that this petitioner’s name also appears in the list along with Nainanad Kumar and Gautam Kumar. When Nainanad Kumar and Gautam Kumar have been reinstated and their removal has been set-aside, similar treatment should be given to this petitioner also as the case of the petitioner stands on similar footing. 5. Thus the impugned order no. 3771 of 2017 so far as this petitioner-Rinki Kumari is concerned, is set-aside. She is directed to be reinstated immediately. 6. In term of order dated 18.01.2018 in WP(S) No. 7458 of 2017, this writ petition stands allowed. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Tanuj/