2025:HHC:29455 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CMPMO No. 540 of 2019 Decided on : 30.08.2025 Sh. Inder Pal Singh and others …Petitioners Versus Sh. Rajiv Nangia …Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : None. For the respondent : Mr. Abhishek Banta, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) This case was called in the pre-lunch session on number of occasions, but none has appeared on behalf of the petitioners. Thereafter, the case was called in the post lunch session also, but again none has appeared on behalf of the petitioners. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent otherwise submits that the possession of the demises premises has already been handed over to the respondent-landlord through the process of Court. 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:29455 3. Be that as it may, as none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners to pursue the litigation, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated forthwith. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 30, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)