RAM KARAN SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS
A227/2835/2025 · 2025-05-16
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 139908 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 139908 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:29032 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2835 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Karan Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bisunbablu Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):-
"Wherefore it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the opposite party no. 2 to accord permission /approval for disposal of Case No. 1864/133 (Amar Bahadur Singh and another Versus State of U.P. and another) at an early date or as per order of this Hon'ble court, within a stipulated period, which this Hon'ble court thinks fit and proper, enabling the petitioner to get justice during his life time, to secure the ends of justice." In compliance of earlier order of this Court, Sri Vinay Kumar Srivastava, Consolidation Officer, Pratapgarh, is present before this Court. He submitted that proceedings of the pending case in issue i.e. Case No. 1864/133 (Amar Bahadur Singh Versus State of U.P.), would be concluded within a period of three months from today. In view of the aforesaid statement of Sri Vinay Kumar Srivastava, Consolidation Officer, Pratapgarh, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to consider and decide the case in issue, detailed above, most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party preferably within a period of three months from today. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 16.5.2025 Jyoti/- Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench