IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 106-2 CWP-12395-2001 Date of Decision : November 28, 2025 CANARA BANK -PETITIONER V/S CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND ANR. -RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Himanshu Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. *** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, by efflux of time, the issue inhering the writ petition has lost its significance, and therefore, he does not wish to press the writ petition at this stage. However, he seeks liberty to file an apt application for revival of the writ petition, in case necessity arises in future. 2. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed, as not pressed, with liberty (supra). (KULDEEP TIWARI) November 28, 2025 JUDGE devinder Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No DEVINDER YADAV 2025.11.29 11:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment