Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Gujarat · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1399 (GUJ)

SIDDHRAJ @ SURYA DHIRUBHAI MAYDA v. STATE OF GUJARAT

SCR.A/17321/2025 · 2026-03-18

P M Raval

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

R/SCR.A/17321/2025 ORDER DATED: 18/03/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (REGULARIZED DAY OF LATE SURRENDER) NO. 17321 of 2025 ========================================================== SIDDHRAJ @ SURYA DHIRUBHAI MAYDA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. ========================================================== Appearance: THROUGH JAIL for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR. ROHAN SHAH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL Date : 18/03/2026 ORAL ORDER 1. The applicant is before this Court for regularization of 235 days after being apprehended by the police authority. 2. It transpires from the jail remarks that the applicant was released for 14 days on furlough leave from 05.09.2023 to 18.09.2023, however, he has apprehended by the police, and thus, there was a delay of 235 days, pursuant to which, I. G. Prison was moved by an application dated 13.05.2025 for regularization of 235 days which came to be rejected vide order dated 17.07.2025, and the authority has imposed the punishment of deducting 3 furlough vide order dated 30.05.2024. It is the order of rejection dated 30.05.2024 which is challenged before this Court. 3. In view of the judgment passed by this Court in the case of Vikas Narendrabhai v. State of Gujarat, dated 04.02.2014, in R/SCR.A/17321/2025 ORDER DATED: 18/03/2026 Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.1360 of 2014, wherein it is held that the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (now Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) does not permit to set aside the subsequent offence committed under the Prisons Act for violation of condition of parole. 4. In view of the same, the present application stands rejected. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the question of whether the facts of the present case to entitle him for condonation of delay before the jail authority. 6. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned jail authority, forthwith, for onward communication to the applicant. (P. M. RAVAL, J) NITIN MAKWANA Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: NITIN INDRAVADAN MAKWANA(HCW0110), ENGLISH STENOGRAPHER GRADE I, at High Court of Gujarat on 18/03/2026 18:51:10