IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 521 of 2025 Date of Decision: 01.08.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Dr. Suneela Sharma ……...Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & Anr. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Virbahadur Verma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar & Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) While placing on record communication dated 21.06.2025, issued under the signatures of Under Secretary (Education) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, enclosing therewith copy of office order dated 19.05.2025, passed in purported compliance of mandate contained in the judgment, alleged to have been violated, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, states that mandate contained in the judgment, alleged to have been violated, stands complied with and as such, no action of the respondents can be said to be contumacious. 2 2. Having perused aforesaid documents, which are taken on record, coupled with the fact that there was only direction to consider and decide the case of the petitioner and respondents, after having considered the case of the petitioner, have rejected the same, this Court is persuaded to agree with afore submission of Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, and as such, no case of contempt is made out. 3. In view of above, contempt proceedings are closed. Notice issued to the respondents are discharged. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law, laying therein challenge to order passed in purported compliance of judgment, alleged to have been violated. August 01, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (Sunil) Judge