Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13985 (PNJ)

SURJIT KAUR v. GURDEV SINGH AND OTHERS

CR/608/2024 · 2025-04-22

Anil Kshetarpal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CR-608-2024 (O&M) -1- 134 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-608-2024 (O&M) Date of decision : 22.04.2025 Smt. Surjit Kaur ...Petitioner Vs. Gurdev Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL Present: Mr. Anuj Balyan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Fateh Saini, Advocate for respondent No.1. *** ANIL KSHETARPAL , J. (Oral) 1. On 03.04.2025, the following order was passed:- "Learned counsel representing respondent No.1 pray for a short accommodation to seek instructions, “as to whether the allotment letter dated 30.04.1974 is with respondent No.1 or not”? List on 08.04.2025". 2. Learned counsel representing respondent No.1 submits that the sales letter dated 01.04.1976, is in his possession and he will produce the same before the trial Court for perusal of the petitioner. 3. This revision petition has been filed by the plaintiff with a prayer to set aside the order dated 14.11.2023, whereby her application for directing the defendant (respondent No.1) to produce the original allotment letter was dismissed. NEERAJ 2025.04.24 17:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-608-2024 (O&M) -2- 4. Since the defendant (respondent No.1) has agreed to produce the sales letter dated 01.04.1976, before the trial Court, the present revision petition is rendered infructuous. However, the defendant (respondent No.1) shall remain bound to produce the sales letter dated 01.04.1976 before the trial Court for the perusal of the plaintiff. 5. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. (ANIL KSHETARPAL) 22.04.2025 JUDGE neeraj Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes No Whether Reportable : Yes No NEERAJ 2025.04.24 17:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document