Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13984 (AP)

MANDRU PRASAD v. THE CHAIRMAN O.N.G.C. TELEBHAVAN AND 2 OTHERS

WP/14172/2005 · 2025-05-08

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:rAMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) ' - Hi' FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MAY / TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 14172 OF 2005 Between: Mandru Prasad, S/o. M.Dasu, aged about 29 Gunupudi, Bhimavaram' W.G.District.. years, unemployee, Garuvupeta, ...Petitioner AND 1. The Chairman O.N.G.C. Teiebhavan, Dehradun 2. The General Manager K.G.& Si, Project, Chennai. 3. The General Manager, Rajahmundry, E.G.District. K.G;ProJect Bus Complex, Lalacheruvu, ...Respondents Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fiied therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue may a writ or order or direction, particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the inaction ^ consider and dispose of the application submitted by the was received by him on 23.3 2004 for of the 1st respondent to petitioner, which appointing the petitioner death of his father ONGC, Rajahmundry, till on compassionate grounds in any suitable post due to the while in service as security jnspector, Gr.ll in today and the proceedings of the 3rd respondent bearing issued to Madru Emili and granting 'financial assistance in lieu of gainful appointment contrary to the terrii* paragraph No.3 (a) 3 of the Award of the Lok Adalat, Bhimavaram Dl.2i a.2004 dt.21.2.2004 in A.S.No.10/1996 N0.RJY/I/EBG/112/99 -ESTT dt.29.4.2005 i Mandru Seetharatnam as illegal, arbitrary and unwarranted and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the! Tst respondent to consider the case of tHe petitioner for appointment on compassionate grounds in a suitable post in the O.N.G.C. immediately I.A. NO: 1 OF 2005(WPMP. NO: 18Q03 OF 2005) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in suppott of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent to consider the application of the petitioner, which was received by him on 23.3.2004, for appointment compassionate grounds in an suitable post in the respondent corporation pending disposal of the above wnrpetition on Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S SURENDRA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI P BADRINATH Counsel for the Respondent No.3; SRI KAKARA VENKATA RAO The Court made the following: Order AKriC010170832005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] B FRIDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 14172/2005 Between: Mandru Prasad ...PETITIONER AND The Chairman O N G C Telebhavan And 2 Others and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.SSURENDRA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.KAKARA VENKATA RAO 2.PBADRINATH The Court made the following: ORDER For no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 08.04.2025 and 25.04.2025 and since the matter pertains to the year 2005, the matter to be listed today under the caption "for dismissal". Despite the same, today also there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. came In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- A. VIJAYA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// To, SECTION OFFICER 1. One CC to SRI S SURENDRA KUMAR Advocate [OPUC] x2. One CC to SRI KAKARA VENKATA RAO Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRI P BADRINATH Advocate [OPUC] Three CD Copies gsg HIGH COURT DATED: 09/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.14172 of 2005 2 3 SEP 2025 fj iS> . Current aecuon . DISMISSING THE WP FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS