Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 139811 (ALL)

SUDHIR KUMAR CHOURASIA v. DISTT JUDGE. RAEBARELI AND ORS.

WRIA/1000052/2012 · 2025-05-02

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:25474 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1000052 of 2012 Petitioner :- Sudhir Kumar Chourasia Respondent :- Distt Judge. Raebareli And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- S.P Shukla,Aditya Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C,Anurag Srivastava,Durga Prasad Shukla,Km. Vishwa Mohini,Manish Kumar,Sanjay Gulati,Sudheer Pandey,Sunil Pandey,Vimal Kumar Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. 1. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner even in the revised call. 2. Although Sri Aditya Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner, is reported to be on sanctioned leave, however the matter is very old one, I am not inclined to adjourn the matter. 3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the orders dated 19.01.2012 passed on the application filed under Section 16 of the U.P. Act No. XIII of 1972, whereby the release application was rejected as well as the order dated 31.03.2012, whereby the revision was also dismissed. 4. Considering the fact that U.P. Act No. XIII of 1972 has been repealed, the present petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to file fresh proceedings, if so advised, under the Tenancy Act of 2021. In case, a fresh proceedings are filed, the same shall be decided within the time prescribed in the statute. The order impugned in the present petition shall not come in the way in deciding the application on its own merits in accordance with law. 5. This order has been passed in the presence of Sri Durga Prasad Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent. Order Date :- 2.5.2025 Arun Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench