Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13978 (AP)

MADDALA VENKATESWARA RAO v. M.GIRIJA SHANKAR,IAS

CC/2113/2024 · 2025-02-21

Ninala Jayasurya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010171192024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Contempt Case No:2113 of 2024 Between: Maddala Venkateswara Rao, S/o. Peraiah, aged about 49 years, Occ:Agriculture, R/o.Dorasanipadu Village, Dwaraka Tirumala Mandal, Eluru District. ...Petitioner AND M.Girija Shankar, I.A.S., Commissioner Panchayat Raj, Tadepalli, Guntur District and Others ...Contemnors Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Mr. Venkata Subbaiah Pugula Counsel for the Contemnors: 1. Mr. N Srihari 2. Mr. J Dileep Kumar The Court made the following Order: Heard Mr. Adarsh Kumar, learned counsel, representing the learned counsel for the petitioner, who appeared through online. 2. At the time of considering the matter, it is submitted that a notice dated 10.02.2025 is issued to the petitioner to submit necessary and relevant documents in respect of the subject matter property in the writ petition and in view of the same, the contempt case may be closed. The learned counsel for the petitioner also states that reply was sent through registered post on 20.02.2025. 3. As the Panchayat Secretary is required to consider the reply, the contempt case is closed, observing that appropriate orders shall be passed in accordance with law, after giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. No costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date: 21.02.2025 Ksj