SURYA BAHADUR SINGH v. CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF REVENUE, U.P., LUCKNOW AND OTHERS
A227/2828/2025 · 2025-05-14
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 139739 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 139739 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:28041 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2828 of 2025 Petitioner :- Surya Bahadur Singh Respondent :- Chairman, Board Of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arjun Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Yogesh Awasthi, learned State Counsel. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The present petition has been filed for the following main relief:-
"[1] Issue an order or direction to the opposite party no. 1 to decide the decide the REV/ 1920/2024/ Gonda [Computerized No.R20240830001920] U/S 210 U.P. Revenue Code 2006 Pankaj Singh Versus Surya Bahadur Singh and others as contained in ANNEXURE NO. 2 to this petition expeditiously within the time fixed by this Hon'ble Court in the interest of justice." It is stated that as per Rule 183(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 made under U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 read with para 458(2) of U.P. Revenue Court Manual, an appeal or revision should preferably be decided within a period of six months. However, in the instant case, the revision is pending since July 2024 and on account of pendency of the same, the petitioner, is suffering great hardship and mental agony. Prayer is to direct the authority concerned to decide the case within stipulated time. It is further submitted that though a large number of dates have been fixed, however, for the reasons beyond control, the matter has not yet been decided. Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. In view of above, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the Authority concerned to decide the pending revision within 6 months from the next date fixed in the matter, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard, after providing proper opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation. For conducting the proceedings in the time specified, unnecessary adjournments be avoided. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 14.5.2025 Jyoti/- Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench