IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Malak Singh @ Malik Singh State of Haryana CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Gursimar Singh, Advocate, Mr. Neeraj Sansaniwal, Advocate, Ms. Sukhmani Chandok, Advocate, for the Mr. P.P.Chahar, Sr. DAG, Haryana. DEEPAK SIBAL Learned counsel for the the appellant’s trial stage he would be satisfied if Court to finally 2. Learned State counsel afore alternate prayer made 3. The appellant has months and the to the acceptance of the afore alternate prayer Therefore and finding the present appeal is disposed of the appellant’s trial it, in accordance with law 4. Di October 27, 202 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : Sr. No.105 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRA-D-817 Date of Decision : Malak Singh @ Malik Singh Versus Haryana HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Gursimar Singh, Advocate, Mr. Neeraj Sansaniwal, Advocate, Ms. Sukhmani Chandok, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. P.P.Chahar, Sr. DAG, Haryana. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant’s trial, only one prosecution witness remains to be examined he would be satisfied if the appeal is disposed of with a direction to the trial dispose the appellant’s trial in a time Learned State counsel has no objection afore alternate prayer made on behalf of the appellant. The appellant has been in custody for the last 01 the trial is at its fag end as also learned State counsel has no objection to the acceptance of the afore alternate prayer made on behalf of the appel herefore and finding the appellant’s alternate prayer to be reasonable present appeal is disposed of with a direction to the trial Court to finally the appellant’s trial within a period of one month from the next date fixed before , in accordance with law. Disposed of. (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 817-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : 27.10.2025 …Appellant …Respondent DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI submits that since as on date in , only one prosecution witness remains to be examined, at this the appeal is disposed of with a direction to the trial in a time-bound manner. has no objection to the acceptance of the on behalf of the appellant. been in custody for the last 01 year and 10 fag end as also learned State counsel has no objection made on behalf of the appellant. appellant’s alternate prayer to be reasonable, the with a direction to the trial Court to finally complete within a period of one month from the next date fixed before DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2025.10.31 11:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document