Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 139717 (ALL)

MANGRU v. THE SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, TANDA, AMBEDKAR NAGAR AND OTHERS

A227/2836/2025 · 2025-05-14

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:28036 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2836 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mangru Respondent :- The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tanda, Ambedkar Nagar And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Singh,Anuj Kumar Gupta,Shri Kishan Prajapati Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The present petition has been filed, seeking following main relief:- "(i) Set aside the interim order dated 24.07.2023 passed by the opposite party no.2 in Application No. 03666/2022 (Computerizes Case No. T202204040303666): under section 24 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 bearing title "Mangru Vs. Chandrawati & others"(contained as ANNEXURE No1 to this petition). (ii) Issue a order or direction commanding the opposite party no. 1 to expeditiously decide the Application No. 03666/2022 (Computerizes Case No. T202204040303666): under section 24 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 bearing title "Mangru Vs. Chandrawati & others" within stipulated time fixed by this Hon'ble Court." Taking note of the fact that case in issue was instituted under Section 24 of the Code of 2006 and as per Section 24(3) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 read with U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, the demarcation proceedings, being summary in nature, should preferably be decided within a period of three months, however, in the instant case, the proceeding in issue is pending since 2023, the respondent No.-1 is directed to consider and decide the pending proceedings in issue, detailed above, most expeditiously, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment, preferably within a period of three months from the next date fixed before it, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 14.5.2025 Jyoti/- Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench