APHC010169692007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 19677/2007 Between: 1. B. REDDAPPA, KADAPA DISTRICT, R/O BADVEL, WORKING AS WORK INSPECTOR(HOUSING)BADVEL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR HYDERABAD 3 OTHERS, LIMITED, URDU HALL LANE, HILMAYATNAGAR, HYDERABAD. 2. THE DISTRICT MANAGER A P STATE HOUSING CORPORATION, LIMITED, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT MANAGER A P STATE HOUSING CORPORATION, LIMITED, ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT MANAGER A P STATE HOUSING CORPORATION, LIMITED, KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ , order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus for prolonged pending enquiry without any progress for more than 10 years, since the suspension order passed by the 1st respondent vide No.A2/1289/94 dt. 24.11.1997 or any subsequent orders passed supplement to the suspension order are bad, illegal, arbitrary, unjust, and against to Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution of India and also against G.O.Ms.No.480 GAD dt. 07.09.1993 and G.O.Ms.No.578 GA (Ser-C) Dept., dt. 31.12.1999 respectively for not reviewing the suspension orders and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.65 dt. 08.08.1996 along with promotion and all attendant benefits with retrospective effect on par with the other people who already regularized. IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 25369 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the entire record of the petitioner to see any progress has been taken place for the last 10 years after suspension pending writ petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 21955 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V SURENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. E V JAGANNADHA RAO (SC FOR AP STATE HOUSEING COOP LTD) 2. . The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri V.Surender Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not in contact with him for a long time and he has no instructions in the matter. 2. Since the matter pertains to the year 2007, the party should invariable be in contact with his advocate, however, in the present case, the petitioner had not been pursuing the case through his advocate, it shows that the petitioner had no interest in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the Writ Petition is liable to be dismissed. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. However, if the petitioner feels that the cause still survives, he can file appropriate application within a period of two (02) months. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 15th September, 2025 RKS