Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2859 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2100 of 2024 Applicant :- Hari Shankar Shukla Opposite Party :- Sri, Ram Achal Kuril, Executive OfÏcer Nagar Palika Parisad Pratapgarh Counsel for Applicant :- Anup Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- Sampurna Nand Shukla Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. 1. The present contempt application has been preferred for non-compliance of the judgment and order dated 15.02.2024. The relevant extract of the said judgment is quoted hereinbelow:- "Considering innocuous prayer being made by learned counsel for the petitioner and without entering into the merits of the case petitioner is granted liberty to file a fresh representation before opposite party No. 4 i.e. Executive OfÏcer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Belha, Pratapgarh. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided within period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. He shall also take into account the delay in payment and shall pass appropriate orders with regard to interest payable to petitioner as well. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of." 2. Respondent no. 2 has filed an afÏdavit of compliance deciding the representation of the applicant vide order dated 29.08.2024. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the respondent no. 2 has denied the claim of the applicant and though it is admitted that the balance amount of Rs. 5,56,229/- is left to be paid and the same will paid as per the availability of funds, so the order/judgment of the writ court has been flouted by the respondent no. 2. 4. From the perusal of the judgment and order, it is found that it was provided with regard to pass appropriate orders with regard to the interest payable to the applicant may also be considered. The said part has also been discussed in the order dated 29.08.2024. There is no specific direction by the writ court for payment of amount of interest or any specific interest. 5. In view of the above, the judgment and order passed by the writ court has been complied with and now nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present contempt application and for all practical purposes, the present contempt application has become infructuous. 6. As such, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. 7. Notice, if any, stands discharged. Order Date :- 16.1.2025 DiVYa Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench