[2025:RJ-JP:14996] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4759/2025 Sahita Wife Of Shri Daya Ram, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of 264, Meghwalon Ka Bas, Khariya, Mithapur, Jodhpur, At Present Posted As Senior Teacher, At Government Secondary School Basni, District Bundi (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan. 3. Joint Director, Secondary School Education, Kota Division, Kota (Raj.) 4. District Education Officer Bundi, District Bundi (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bajrang Sepat For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 03/04/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that before approaching this Court, the petitioner approached the respondents by way of filing a representation for redressal of his grievances, but for the reasons best known to the authority, the representation submitted by the petitioner has not been decided. 2. Learned counsel further submits that the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Pawan Meena Versus State of Rajasthan (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024 [2025:RJ-JP:14996] (2 of 2) [CW-4759/2025] decided on 02.02.2024) has directed all the Departments of the State to decide the representation within a stipulated time, but inspite of passing of the said order, till date, the representation submitted by the petitioner has not been decided. 3. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 4. Considering the arguments put forward by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition stands disposed of with direction to the respondents to decide the representation (pending, if any) expeditiously as early as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, strictly in accordance with law, by passing a reasoned and speaking order. 5. The stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. 6. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not passed any direction/order to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner in a particular way. The respondents would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/22