Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 139680 (ALL)

RAJ KUMAR RAI AND 5 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF SECONDARY EDU. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/5307/2025 · 2025-05-15

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:28489 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5307 of 2025 Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Rai And 5 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Secondary Edu. Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shrawan Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Heard Sri S.K. Verma, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Uday Veer Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for all the opposite parties. By means of this petition, the petitioners have prayed the following reliefs:- "i. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/ directing the opposite party No.2 to take appropriate decision for payment of due emoluments/salary alongwith 12% interest in pursuant to Govt. order dated 09.11.2023 from due dates till actual payment made to the petitioners." Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are ready to prefer a fresh separate representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, they may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to their respective DIOS and a direction may be issued to him to consider and decide the said representations of the petitioners with expedition. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection if direction for disposal of the said representation is issued. Therefore, in view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose of this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioners to prefer a fresh separate representation to their respective DIOS ventilating their grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with them enclosing therewith the copy of their earlier representations, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of fifteen days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioners within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioners forthwith. This writ petition is disposed of, in view of the aforesaid terms. Order Date :- 15.5.2025 Anurag Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench