Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 139678 (ALL)

ABDUL RAHMAN v. U.O.I. THRU. SECY. MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATION NEW DELHI AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/5225/2025 · 2025-05-12

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:27757 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5225 of 2025 Petitioner :- Abdul Rahman Respondent :- U.O.I. Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Communication New Delhi And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Deo Prakash Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Dwijendra Mishra Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Anand Dwivedi, learned Counsel for Union of India and Shri Dwijendra Mishra, learned Counsel for the opposite parties no.2 and 3. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that privilege leave encashment has not been paid to the petitioner, who has retired way back on 31.03.2023. 3. Nevertheless, considering the nature of grievance, the petition is disposed of with the direction to the opposite party no.3 to look into the matter, verify the facts and take a decision as regards payment of privilege leave encashment to the petitioner within two months from the date a copy of this order is submitted. Needless to say that if any interest is payable on the said amount, the same shall also be paid as per rules. 4. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 12.5.2025 RBS/- Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench