AJEET KUMAR @ AJIT KUMAR v. PRIN. JUDGE FAMILY COURT RAEBARELI AND ANOTHER
A227/2833/2025 · 2025-05-14
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 139677 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 139677 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:28100 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2833 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ajeet Kumar @ Ajit Kumar Respondent :- Prin. Judge Family Court Raebareli And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Pandey,Ankur Pathak,Shubham Singh,Vivek Pandey Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner stating that as the petitioner could not appear in the proceedings, the proceedings were
directed to be held exparte, subsequently, an application was moved for recalling the order for direction to proceed exparte, which was allowed vide order dated 03.02.2025 on a cost of Rs.3000/-.
3. As the petitioner did not pay the cost of Rs.3000/-, an order was passed on 16.04.2025 directing that the proceeding shall remain exparte.
4. The counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is ready and willing to deposit the cost of Rs.3000/-.
5. In view of the said statement, the present petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to deposit the cost of Rs.3000/- within a period of one week from today and to move an appropriate application for permitting the petitioner to participate in the proceedings. In case, the said cost is paid, the respondent no. 1 shall pass appropriate order in consonance with the order dated 03.02.2025.
Order Date :- 14.5.2025 Arun Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench