Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13967 (PNJ)

VIJAY KUMAR CHAWLA AND ANOTHER v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

CRM-M/3475/2025 · 2025-05-12

Kirti Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-3475 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 118 Vijay Kumar Chawla and another Union of India and others CORAM: Present:-. KIRTI SINGH, J. Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 08.01.2025 (Annexure P withdrawal request for 2. Police, (Crime), Panchkula State counsel on behalf of respondent No.3, Learned State counsel on instructions from Inspector Bachu Singh, submits that which basis the FIR was quashed by this Court against the petitioners have been revoked. 3475-2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of Decision: Vijay Kumar Chawla and another Versus of India and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Mr. Ajaivir Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Satya Pal Jain, Additional Solicitor General of India with Ms. Saigeet Srivastava, Advocate for respondents Ms. Mahima Yashpal, DAG, Haryana ***** KIRTI SINGH, J.(Oral) This petition under Section Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed for 08.01.2025 (Annexure P-11), passed by respondent No.3 whereby the withdrawal request for Look Out Circular Reply by way of affidavit of Assistant Commissioner of Police, (Crime), Panchkula dated 07.05.2025 State counsel on behalf of respondent No.3, Learned State counsel on instructions from Inspector Bachu Singh, submits that the matter has been compromised between which basis the FIR was quashed by this Court against the petitioners have been revoked. - 1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH CRM-M-3475-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.05.2025 ...Petitioners ...Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH , Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Satya Pal Jain, Additional Solicitor General of India with aigeet Srivastava, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. Ms. Mahima Yashpal, DAG, Haryana. Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagarik has been filed for quashing of order dated 11), passed by respondent No.3 whereby the (LOC) has been declined. way of affidavit of Assistant Commissioner of 5.2025, has been filed by learned State counsel on behalf of respondent No.3, which is taken on record. Learned State counsel on instructions from Inspector Bachu Singh, the matter has been compromised between the parties on which basis the FIR was quashed by this Court and and the LOC’s issued against the petitioners have been revoked. s s 528 of Bhartiya Nagarik quashing of order dated 11), passed by respondent No.3 whereby the way of affidavit of Assistant Commissioner of learned is taken on record. Learned State counsel on instructions from Inspector Bachu Singh, on issued KAPIL 2025.05.12 18:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-3475 3. controverted the aforesaid factual aspect present petition. 4. 5. accordingly. 12.05.2025 Kapil Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 3475-2025 (O&M) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has not controverted the aforesaid factual aspect and prays for withdrawal of the nt petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stands disposed of accordingly. .2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable - 2- Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has not and prays for withdrawal of the Pending application(s), if any, shall also stands disposed of (KIRTI SINGH) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has not and prays for withdrawal of the Pending application(s), if any, shall also stands disposed of KAPIL 2025.05.12 18:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document