4PHC010170462011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) I FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 23477 OF 2011 Between: Melam Venkata Subba Rao, S/o. Venkata Rama Rao, aged about 50 years, R/o. Penumadam Village, Poduru Mandal, West Godavari District ...PETITIONER AND 1. The District Collector, West Godavari District at Eluru. 2. The District Cooperative Officer, West Godavari District at Eluru Bhimavaram Division, West 3. The Divisional Cooperative Officer Godavari District 4. Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society, Penumandam, Penumandam Village, Poduru Mandal, West Godavari District Rep by its President 5. V. Madndeswara Rao, S/o. Venkata Subba Rao, aged about 53 years, R/o. Penumandam Village, Poduru Mandal, West Godavari District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 2 disposing of the Appeal filed by the 5*^ respondent in 2001 challenging his nd respondent in not dismissal order dt. 26.07.2001 as arbitrary, illegal, improper, and consequently direct the 2'^'^ respondent to dispose of the same forthwith. LA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 28743 OF 20111 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 2'^'^ respondent to dispose of the Appeal filed by the 5*'' respondent in 2001 challenging his dismissal order dt. 26.7.2001 pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT. BOBBA VIJAYALAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3:GP FOR COOPERATION Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 & 5:-— The Court made the following order: APHC010170462011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE [3330] PRESENT the honourable SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 23477/2011 Between; 1.MELAM VENKATA SUBBA RAO, S/0. VENKATA RAMA RAO R/0. PENUMADAM VILLAGE, PODURU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1.DIST COLLECTOR WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT ELURU 2 THE DISTRICT COOPRATIVE OFFICER, WEST GODAVARI district at ELURU 3.THE DIVISIONAL COOPRATIVE OFFICER, BHIMAVARAM division, west GODAVARI DISTRICT 4. PRIMARY AGRICUTLURAL COOPERATIVE SOCIETY PENUMANDAM, PENUMANDAM village, PODURU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT REP BY ITS PRESIDENT 5,V MANDESWARA RAO, S/0. VENKATA SUBBA RAO R/0. PENUMANDAM VILLAGE, PODURU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 2nd respondent in not disposing of the Appeal filed by the 5th respondent in 2001 challenging his dismissal order dt.26.7.2001 as arbitrary, illegal, improper, and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to dispose of the same forthwith. 1^0: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 28743 OF 20111 petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 2"^ respondent to dispose of the Appeal 2 4' filed by the 5*" respondent in 2001 challenging his dismissal order dt.26.7.2001 pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BOBBA VIJAYALAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE 2.- 3.GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION N0.23477 of 2011 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed to declare the inaction of the 2*^^ respondent in disposal of the appeal filed by the 5^^ respondent in 2001 challenging the dismissal order, dated 26.07.2001 as arbitrary, illegal, improper and consequently direct the 2'"'^ respondent to dispose of the same forthwith. In view of the representation made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court presumes that the writ petition has rendered infructuous, presuming that the concerned authority has disposed appeal filed by the petitioner. If the same is not disposed, the petitioner IS at liberty to file an application for restoration of writ petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. the As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any shall stand closed. Sd/- U. SRIDEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// Of^^FICER SEpTl To, 1. One CC to Smt. Bobba Vijayalakshmi, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 3. Two CCs to GP for Cooperation, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 4. Two CD Copies. HIGH COURT DATED:27/06/2025 ORDER WP No. 23477 OF 2011 DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS