SYED FAZLUR RAHMAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. ANIMAL HUSBANDRY LKO. AND 10 OTHERS
WRIA/5285/2025 · 2025-05-16
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 139632 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 139632 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:28994 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5285 of 2025 Petitioner :- Syed Fazlur Rahman Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Animal Husbandry Lko. And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Kumar Tripathi,Praveen Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G.I. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard Sri Anand Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Pankaj Patal, learned Standing Counsel for the State-opposite party Nos.1, 3 & 4 and Ms. Harsha Yadav,
learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 and Smt. Sandhya Dubey, learned counsel, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party Nos.6, 10 & 11, the same is taken on record.
2. In view of the proposed order, the notices to remaining opposite parties, who are unrepresented, are hereby dispensed with.
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that the petitioner may be permitted to not press this writ petition at this stage and liberty may be given him to approach the competent court of law.
4. Learned counsel for the opposite parties have stated that the impugned order can be assailed before the Labour Court.
5. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue and without interfering with the impugned termination order, I hereby dispose of this writ petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Competent Court of law for redressal of his grievance.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of finally. . [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]
Order Date :- 16.5.2025 Suresh/ Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench