MOHD NAZIR TH KHALAQ JOO v. U T OF J AND K TH POLICE STATION SURANKOTE AND ANOTHER
Bail App/120/2023 · 2025-04-22
Sindhu Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13963 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13963 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 01
Supp. List-I
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Bail App No. 120/2023 CrlM No. 712/2023
Mohd. Nazir
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:- Mr. Waheed Chowdhary, Advocate with Mr. Nahiem Sheikh, Advocate.
V/s
UT of J&K and another
…..Respondent(s)
Through:- None.
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE
ORDER
22.04.2025
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he is under instructions that almost all the witnesses in the trial have been recorded, therefore, he does not want to press this application at this stage and prays that the trial Court be directed to expedite the proceedings of the case. His statement is taken on record.
In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this application, along with the connected applications, is dismissed as not pressed, with a direction to the trial court to expedite the proceedings of the case.
Disposed of accordingly.
(Sindhu Sharma)
Judge
Jammu:
22.04.2025 Michal Sharma/PS