CHANDRA PAL SINGH v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER LUCKNOW and 2 ORS.
WRIC/1000849/2006 · 2025-09-12
Irshad Ali
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 139618 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 139618 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 1000849 of 2006 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE IRSHAD ALI, J.
1. List has been revised. None for the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel is present.
2. Accordingly, the case is dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. Interim order, if any, is vacated. September 12, 2025 Gautam Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anoop Kumar, Ashok Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.Sc.. (Irshad Ali,J.) Chandra Pal Singh .....Petitioner(s) Additional Commissioner Lucknow And 2 Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAUTAM TECKCHANDANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench