[2025:RJ-JP:17983] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4544/2025 Pratap S/o Subesingh, R/o Village Jhil, Police Station Sadar Narwana, District Jind, Haryana. (At Present Confined In Central Alwar, District Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anushree Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, Dy.G.A HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 29/04/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed by the accused- applicant under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 against the order dated 04.03.2025 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge No.3, Alwar in connection with FIR No.991/2024 registered at Police Station Kotwali Alwar, District Alwar for the offences punishable under Sections 310(2) & 331(6) of BNS, 2023 (later on Section 61(2)(A) of BNS), by which the bail application of the accused-applicant under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 has been dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant has been implicated in this matter only on the information given by the co-accused-Aryan. Learned counsel further submits that the accused-applicant was arrested on 27.11.2024 and since then he is behind the bars. Learned counsel prays that the charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take long [2025:RJ-JP:17983] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4544/2025] time to conclude, therefore, the accused-applicant be enlarged on bail. 3. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application and submits that from the possession of the accused-applicant, some gold ornaments have been recovered, moreover, the vehicle Swift Dzire No. HR-56-C-9200, which was involved in the dacoity has also been recovered from the possession of the present accused-applicant. Learned Public Prosecutor also submits that three other criminal cases are also registered against the present accused-applicant, therefore, he should not be enlarged on bail. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the material available on record. 5. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that some recovery of the looted ornaments has been made from the possession of present accused-applicant, therefore, the bail application of the accused-applicant is liable to be rejected. 6. Accordingly, the bail application filed by the present accused- applicant is dismissed. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J Mohita/143