Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1396 (HP)

SUDESHWAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

/12803/2025 · 2026-02-24

Ajay Mohan Goel

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 12803 of 2025 Decided on: 24.02.2026 Shri Sudeshwar Singh … Petitioner Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : M/s Onkar Jairath, Anshul Jairath and Piyush Mehta, Advocates. For the respondents : Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General for respondents-State. : Ms. Komal Chaudhary, Advocate for respondent No. 5. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has approached the Court, inter alia praying for the following reliefs:- “i. That writ in the nature of certiorari may very kindly be issued quashing and setting aside impugned communication dated 28.07.2025 (Annexure P-5), whereby, the Respondent Department arbitrarily ordered to withdraw the PPO, which were rightly issued in favour of the Petitioner. ii. That the writ in nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions may kindly be issued directing the Respondents to release the Pension and other retiral benefits from due date i.e. w.e.f. 01.06.2020, along with arrear and interest @ 9% per annum.” 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2. Reply to the writ petition has been filed by respondents No. 1 to 3 and respondent No. 4. Learned Counsel for respondent No. 5 has also handed over a copy of instructions received from the Senior Accounts Officer (Legal), dated 23.02.2026, which are taken on record. 3. A perusal of office order Annexure R-2/1 appended with the reply filed by respondents No. 1 to 3 demonstrates that the reliefs being prayed for by the petitioner stands granted by the Department itself in terms of the contents of said communication. 4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that in light of this development, these proceedings be closed but with the observation that let the arrears of pension to which the petitioner is entitled to, be released in his favour expeditiously. 5. In view of above, these proceedings are disposed of with the direction the let the arrears of pension, to which the petitioner is entitled to, be released in his favour as expeditiously as possible and preferably on or before 30.06.2026. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge February 24, 2026 (narender)