MANIKRAO BHAGWANRAO JADHAV v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
WP/1907/2022 · 2025-03-22
Lok Adalat
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13959 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13959 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT PRESIDED OVER BY HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI, HELD ON 22nd March, 2025 AT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES SUB-COMMITTEE AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1907 OF 2022 Manikrao Bhagwanrao Jadhav VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Another • Mr. R. V. Jadhav, Advocate for the Appellant • Mr. A. M. Phule, AGP for Respondent No. 1 • Mr. R. H. Dahat, Advocate for Respondent No. 2
ORDER (22nd March, 2025)
1. Parties have settled the disputes. Both the parties filed terms of compromise on record, which is marked as Exhibit ‘X’ for identification. The compromise is duly signed by claimants and attested by their Advocates.
2. Having regard to the facts of the case, terms of settlement are reasonable and hence, deserves to be accepted. Claimant Laxman who is present before the Court makes statement that the cheque of amount payable towards the compensation be issued in the name of Kushal Manikrao Jadhav. Learned Counsel for Insurer undertakes to pay amount of compensation as agreed by cheque to the 124-WP-1907-2022.odt 1 of 2 2025:BHC-AUG:9434-DB
claimant within a period of 45 days. Learned Counsel for the Claimant records no objection for the same.
3. In view of above, Appeal stands disposed of.
4. The Court Fee Refund Certificate be issued as per the Rules.
5. The Civil Application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
6. The award/decree be drawn up in terms of compromise.
7. No order as to costs. [A. B. Kadethankar] Advocate Member [V. B. Mantri] DJ (Retd.) Member [R. M. JOSHI, J.] Head of Panel
usm 124-WP-1907-2022.odt 2 of 2