IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.6580 of 2021 Decided on: 19.09.2025 _________________________________________________________________ Raghubir Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Goldy Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General for respondents No.1 and 2. Respondents No.3 and 4 ex-partel. ________________________________________________________________ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge CMP No.22983 of 2025 Allowed and disposed of. CWP No.6580 of 2021 With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, matter is heard at this stage 2. This petition has been filed for grant of following reliefs: - “i). That writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - issued and the respondents may kindly be directed to condone the breaks effected by the respondents in the services of the petitioner intentionally during the year 1994 & 1995 and count the same for the purpose of continuing in service as per the ration/law laid down by this Hon'ble Court in various judgments. ii That writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued and the respondents may kindly be directed to regularise the services of the petitioner w.e.f. 01.01.2002 as per 8 years regularisation policy of the State Government prevalent at that time, with all consequential benefits. iii) That writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued and the respondents may kindly be directed to grant pension/pensionary benefits to the petitioner after his retirement on 31.10.2020, with all consequential benefits.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that case of the petitioner and reliefs prayed for, have been adjudicated upon in Shyam Lal Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Others2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would be content if the case of the petitioner is considered by the respondents in light of the aforesaid judgment. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. 2 CWPOA No.6542 of 2019,decided on 17.03.2021 - 3 - 4. Having regard to above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in light of the aforesaid judgment and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The decision so arrived at, shall be communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge September 19, 2025 R.Atal